<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Open Content Alliance (OCA)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opencontentalliance.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-almost-beta-9417</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Gavin Newsom on Stimulus Money for Book Digitization by Kovancılar</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2010/01/26/gavin-newsom-on-stimulus-money-for-book-digitization/comment-page-1/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Kovancılar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=599#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>good videos i am enjoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good videos i am enjoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let’s Not Settle for this Settlement by Kovancılar</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/11/05/lets-not-settle-for-this-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Kovancılar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=194#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>thanx admin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanx admin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Raw Deal for Libraries by Kovancılar</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/12/06/a-raw-deal-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Kovancılar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=270#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>google has worked very good on this path</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google has worked very good on this path</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 70,000 books from Cornell Libraries online now by vamus</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/12/16/70000-books-from-cornell-libraries-online-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>vamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=594#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Its Great and greatly appreciated your work....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its Great and greatly appreciated your work&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Claims to be the Lone Defender of Orphans: Not lone, not defender by Colin Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/10/07/google-claims-to-be-the-lone-defender-of-orphans-not-lone-not-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=586#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>Sadly all ideals seem to have their heads turned by business in the end. For once it would be nice to see a result that benefits all mankind and not just the shareholders of major corporations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly all ideals seem to have their heads turned by business in the end. For once it would be nice to see a result that benefits all mankind and not just the shareholders of major corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let’s Not Settle for this Settlement by Americas Tower</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/11/05/lets-not-settle-for-this-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Americas Tower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=194#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>Siva Vaidhyanathan has posted some new thoughts after contacting Google. Worth a read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siva Vaidhyanathan has posted some new thoughts after contacting Google. Worth a read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Claims to be the Lone Defender of Orphans: Not lone, not defender by Daycare</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/10/07/google-claims-to-be-the-lone-defender-of-orphans-not-lone-not-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>Daycare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=586#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Work From Home ......&lt;/strong&gt;

It is amazing how many moms over look this one ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Work From Home &#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It is amazing how many moms over look this one &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 70,000 books from Cornell Libraries online now by OSWALDO MOORE PRADO</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/12/16/70000-books-from-cornell-libraries-online-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>OSWALDO MOORE PRADO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=594#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>ME PARECE UN EXFUERZO MONUMENTAL DE NUESTRA CIVILIZACION ACTUAL!! COMPARABLE A LA CONSTRUCCION DE LAS PIRAMIDES DE EGIPTO, AL COLOSAL MACHU PICCHU, CONGRATULACIONES POR LA HUMANIDAD!!!
   OSWALDO MOORE PRADO
PRESIDENTE ASOCIACION CIVIL 
  "VIVO POR MAGDALENA"
    EN EL PACIFICO SUR
INDOAMERICA LIMA-PERU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ME PARECE UN EXFUERZO MONUMENTAL DE NUESTRA CIVILIZACION ACTUAL!! COMPARABLE A LA CONSTRUCCION DE LAS PIRAMIDES DE EGIPTO, AL COLOSAL MACHU PICCHU, CONGRATULACIONES POR LA HUMANIDAD!!!<br />
   OSWALDO MOORE PRADO<br />
PRESIDENTE ASOCIACION CIVIL<br />
  &#8220;VIVO POR MAGDALENA&#8221;<br />
    EN EL PACIFICO SUR<br />
INDOAMERICA LIMA-PERU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Monopoly dressed in a Class-action Suit? by best registry guy</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/01/25/a-monopoly-dressed-in-a-class-action-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator>best registry guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=335#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>Have to agree with what Alex said. 100% right :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree with what Alex said. 100% right <img src='http://www.opencontentalliance.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Raw Deal for Libraries by Paid Directory</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/12/06/a-raw-deal-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Paid Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=270#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>that sounds like a pretty good idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that sounds like a pretty good idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 70,000 books from Cornell Libraries online now by Roberto Garcia Espinosa</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/12/16/70000-books-from-cornell-libraries-online-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Garcia Espinosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=594#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>I have no words to appreciate the availability of digitalized books.  The project is awesome.

Sincerely,
Roberto Garcia Espinosa
rgespinosa2002@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no words to appreciate the availability of digitalized books.  The project is awesome.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Roberto Garcia Espinosa<br />
<a href="mailto:rgespinosa2002@yahoo.com">rgespinosa2002@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Claims to be the Lone Defender of Orphans: Not lone, not defender by MyMediaLand</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/10/07/google-claims-to-be-the-lone-defender-of-orphans-not-lone-not-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>MyMediaLand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=586#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>I think all media should be free. i will make all information available to most people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all media should be free. i will make all information available to most people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s All About the Orphans by bamboolabcode</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/02/23/its-all-about-the-orphans/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>bamboolabcode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=367#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making Books Apparent by Shortcovers adds 1.8 million titles from Internet Archives — Shortcovers</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/07/17/making-books-apparent/comment-page-1/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>Shortcovers adds 1.8 million titles from Internet Archives — Shortcovers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=531#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>[...] Backstory We started working with Internet Archive after I presented at their conference &#8220;Making Books Apparent&#8221; in October, when Peter Brantley and Brewster Kahle unveiled the BookServer project . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Backstory We started working with Internet Archive after I presented at their conference &#8220;Making Books Apparent&#8221; in October, when Peter Brantley and Brewster Kahle unveiled the BookServer project . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Raw Deal for Libraries by Antalya escort</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/12/06/a-raw-deal-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>Antalya escort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=270#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>zuum anasını satim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zuum anasını satim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Raw Deal for Libraries by bayrakçı</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/12/06/a-raw-deal-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>bayrakçı</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=270#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>thank you very good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you very good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Claims to be the Lone Defender of Orphans: Not lone, not defender by Frances Grimble</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2009/10/07/google-claims-to-be-the-lone-defender-of-orphans-not-lone-not-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>Frances Grimble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=586#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>In all this hoopla about orphan works, people seem to commonly overlook that Google scanned large quantities of in-print books by easily locatable authors and publishers. Regardless of how you feel about "freeing the orphans," these in-print books are financially necessary to authors and publishers. 

I am a self-publisher of eight books, only one of which is out of print--but it has been supplanted by a second edition that contains all the same material, with additions and updates. I have a website. My books are carried by Ingram (the industry’s largest wholesaler), by Amazon.com, and by numerous other bookstores locatable on the web.

I do not know whether Google scanned my books, because Google has not made their database of scanned books publicly available. I have never seen any public statement from Google (only extensive author speculation) as to how, if at all, the public database represented by Google Book Search compares to Google’s private database of books scanned for the Library Project.

Back when the Author's Guild suit was filed, Google set up a website where copyright holders could list their titles as "not to be scanned" by the Library Project. This was for copyright holders who were not Google Partners, and the site stated the books withdrawn from scanning consideration would also be absent from Google Book Search. I listed all my books in a timely way. However, five of my eight books (one searchable only by title, not author) are now listed on Google Book Search. No text is available, which would be a sure sign that they were scanned, so I don’t know why any data is on Google Book Search when Google said it would not be. I do not object to bibliographic data alone being there, but I would very much like to know whether this means my books were scanned against my express wishes.

In January 2009, I opted out of the entire Settlement (the unrevised version), via a letter written by a copyright lawyer and sent by certified mail to the Settlement Administrator. I understand why he advised me to send a certified letter, because I’ve seen Google’s on-line opt-out form in operation. Pretty much every time you register or buy something on the net, you get a confirmation web page and/or email. After submitting Google’s opt-out-of-the-Settlement form, you get nothing. You do not know whether your opt-out data was registered and you cannot legally prove later that you opted out. I advise any copyright holder who opted out using the online form, to follow this up with a certified letter. 

Then I tried to find out whether my books had been scanned—which information I think should be freely available to all copyright holders, to help them decide whether to opt out of or into the Settlement. I received a form response that said this information would only be released if I opted IN “for fear of false claims.” I said I was only interested in my own books, and submitted full bibliographic information on each, including ISBNs. I received the same response. But I’ve also seen the opt-in form. All it requires is basic bibliographic information that someone who did want to make a false claim could easily find on Amazon and numerous other places.

And:  The revised version of the Settlement still contains that paragraph near the end of the main part that says Google will not commit to _not_ publishing the titles of those who have opted out of the entire Settlement.

Some authors have asked me, why not remain in the Settlement and just opt out my in-print titles? I don’t do business with anyone I can’t trust. I don’t want a publisher (Google) who has massively and knowingly violated copyright law. I don’t want a publisher who theoretically offers me opt-outs (options) but will not commit to honoring them. I don’t want a publisher who will not give me open information about what they have done with my books. I don’t want a publisher who scans my books, then offers me a contract negotiated between themselves and another party (the Author’s Guild) the terms of which I cannot negotiate. Nor can I effectively protest if Google makes a “mistake” and sells any in-print titles that I opted out of the Settlement. (Having to go to Google’s arbitration if they make a “mistake” is a shuck.) I don’t want a publisher who tells me they will do anything they want with my copyrighted material without my prior permission, and pay me what they choose, and that all I can do is lie down and take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all this hoopla about orphan works, people seem to commonly overlook that Google scanned large quantities of in-print books by easily locatable authors and publishers. Regardless of how you feel about &#8220;freeing the orphans,&#8221; these in-print books are financially necessary to authors and publishers. </p>
<p>I am a self-publisher of eight books, only one of which is out of print&#8211;but it has been supplanted by a second edition that contains all the same material, with additions and updates. I have a website. My books are carried by Ingram (the industry’s largest wholesaler), by Amazon.com, and by numerous other bookstores locatable on the web.</p>
<p>I do not know whether Google scanned my books, because Google has not made their database of scanned books publicly available. I have never seen any public statement from Google (only extensive author speculation) as to how, if at all, the public database represented by Google Book Search compares to Google’s private database of books scanned for the Library Project.</p>
<p>Back when the Author&#8217;s Guild suit was filed, Google set up a website where copyright holders could list their titles as &#8220;not to be scanned&#8221; by the Library Project. This was for copyright holders who were not Google Partners, and the site stated the books withdrawn from scanning consideration would also be absent from Google Book Search. I listed all my books in a timely way. However, five of my eight books (one searchable only by title, not author) are now listed on Google Book Search. No text is available, which would be a sure sign that they were scanned, so I don’t know why any data is on Google Book Search when Google said it would not be. I do not object to bibliographic data alone being there, but I would very much like to know whether this means my books were scanned against my express wishes.</p>
<p>In January 2009, I opted out of the entire Settlement (the unrevised version), via a letter written by a copyright lawyer and sent by certified mail to the Settlement Administrator. I understand why he advised me to send a certified letter, because I’ve seen Google’s on-line opt-out form in operation. Pretty much every time you register or buy something on the net, you get a confirmation web page and/or email. After submitting Google’s opt-out-of-the-Settlement form, you get nothing. You do not know whether your opt-out data was registered and you cannot legally prove later that you opted out. I advise any copyright holder who opted out using the online form, to follow this up with a certified letter. </p>
<p>Then I tried to find out whether my books had been scanned—which information I think should be freely available to all copyright holders, to help them decide whether to opt out of or into the Settlement. I received a form response that said this information would only be released if I opted IN “for fear of false claims.” I said I was only interested in my own books, and submitted full bibliographic information on each, including ISBNs. I received the same response. But I’ve also seen the opt-in form. All it requires is basic bibliographic information that someone who did want to make a false claim could easily find on Amazon and numerous other places.</p>
<p>And:  The revised version of the Settlement still contains that paragraph near the end of the main part that says Google will not commit to _not_ publishing the titles of those who have opted out of the entire Settlement.</p>
<p>Some authors have asked me, why not remain in the Settlement and just opt out my in-print titles? I don’t do business with anyone I can’t trust. I don’t want a publisher (Google) who has massively and knowingly violated copyright law. I don’t want a publisher who theoretically offers me opt-outs (options) but will not commit to honoring them. I don’t want a publisher who will not give me open information about what they have done with my books. I don’t want a publisher who scans my books, then offers me a contract negotiated between themselves and another party (the Author’s Guild) the terms of which I cannot negotiate. Nor can I effectively protest if Google makes a “mistake” and sells any in-print titles that I opted out of the Settlement. (Having to go to Google’s arbitration if they make a “mistake” is a shuck.) I don’t want a publisher who tells me they will do anything they want with my copyrighted material without my prior permission, and pay me what they choose, and that all I can do is lie down and take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Raw Deal for Libraries by Watch online movies</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/12/06/a-raw-deal-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch online movies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=270#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>as Google’s collaboration with Chinese authorities demonstrates, this can easily morph into supporting authoritarians of all stripes. Exactly true..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as Google’s collaboration with Chinese authorities demonstrates, this can easily morph into supporting authoritarians of all stripes. Exactly true..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Raw Deal for Libraries by fiber su deposu</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/12/06/a-raw-deal-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>fiber su deposu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=270#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>guzel bır paylasım sunmussun. cok saol bırader devamını dılıyoruz .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guzel bır paylasım sunmussun. cok saol bırader devamını dılıyoruz .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Raw Deal for Libraries by radyo reklam</title>
		<link>http://www.opencontentalliance.org/2008/12/06/a-raw-deal-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>radyo reklam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opencontentalliance.org/?p=270#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bibersa.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Radyo Reklam &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bibersa.com" rel="nofollow">Radyo Reklam </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
