Google at their word

As part of Google’s propaganda tour selling their proposed book monopoly, a surprising and seemingly hypocritical theme emerged loud and clear. Straight from the “have cake and eat it too” department, Google’s senior traveling digital book salesman, Dan Clancy, professed his undying commitment to the legislative process as it relates to orphan works.

At a Computer History Museum event last week in Silicon Valley, Clancy suggested that the best way to address the orphan books issue is for Congress to pass legislation, and that Google is not only supportive of this effort, but pushing for it.

Well, we’d like to take Google at their word and hope that they live up to that commitment. And we hope that they do it in a way that is honest and forthright, not self-serving and diversionary. At the Internet Archive, we believe that the right way to gain access to orphan books is to not break the law while you are doing it, and to work through Congress to ensure that the people’s voice in copyright is articulated the way the system was designed to work, not through a private, secret deal that we’re being assured is in our best interests by Google. For the browsing, lending, and vending of digital books, the Archive is seeking an open and competitive market with appropriate safeguards for readers, not a monopoly bookstore created by the biggest online advertising company in the world.

No one elected Google to write copyright law for America. And the Author’s Guild and American Association of Publishers simply do not accurately represent the diverse cross-section of those communities. If Google is really interested in honoring our legislative process, let’s acknowledge that Congress is the path that our government chose to make copyright law and codify its exceptions — instead of crafting secret deals through class action settlements.

To that end, we are calling on Google to petition the court and seek a delay to the October hearing regarding the settlement. Furthermore, we demand that Google publicly demonstrate their leadership and influence in DC to immediately fuel the legislative process on orphan works. That way, they could be part of a truly “non-exclusive” deal by ensuring that all stakeholders are provided the same set of rules from Day 1.

We await Google’s response.

Tags: , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “Google at their word”

  1. Madster Says:

    So much hate implied in your words makes them hard to read, even more so to believe.

    I keep reading about “monopoly”, but at the same time I read anyone else can strike the same deal. Being first to market is not a bad thing, if it was so there would be no new markets, ever.

    Also, before this came along no one was even considering undertaking such a job. Legislation needs to be made, and Google seems to agree. No one elected them but also no one elected the other copyright bodies that put draconian restrictions all over the place.
    I’d rather have google over them.

    And yeah, they’ll probably make them public with contextual ads. It’s their thing. Sounds good to me.

  2. Google Books: ¿una biblioteca digital al margen de la ley? « Quintus Innova Says:

    […] Google at their Word, por Open Content Alliance (The Internet Archive, etc) […]

  3. Jay Says:


    You don’t know what the hell you’re talking about. Your opinion is flawed.

  4. Petouco Says:

    Perhaps if Google don’t do it, it never will to do.
    The other firms, the only want is money, don’t want to offer a beter service to the surfers of Internet.

    There are very much video on-line webs, and very search engines like google. Prevents anyone that there are more libraries on line.

    Google was never reprimanded by monopolistic practices, but is the pretext to stop its business.

    PD. Sorry for my english :).

  5. Open Books, Amazon, Microsoft & Yahoo Against Google | | Yogesh Malik| | Subtleties and Shades of Web, Net and Apps Says:

    […] Earlier this summer, Jeffrey P. Bezos, Amazon’s chief executive, criticized the settlement. Open Content Alliance has something to say about Google […]

  6. Google Book Settlement Link Dump Awesomeness at Says:

    […] Open Content Alliance: Google at their word […]

  7. Google Books traslada el debate por la digitalización a Europa « Industria del Libro Says:

    […] consulta 07/09/09 […]

  8. Musematic » Orphan Works solution via Google or legislation? Says:

    […] article from the Internet Archive on the Orphan Works issue, and whether Google is going to grab the role of Superman-to-the-rescue, and by the way make money […]